HomeAbout SPIFor PatientsFor PhysiciansSPI DoctorsDirections206.215.2480

Clinical Training CoursesTechnical AssistanceBrachytherapy ConferencePCa Commentary



PCa Commentary
 

Lycopene and Selenium Update:  

More Precincts Reporting Votes In The Election Regarding The Roles Lycopene And Selenium in Prostate Cancer Intervention

LYCOPENE: One CLINICAL vote for lycopene was cast by the report from New Dehli: "A comparison of lycopene and orchidectomy vs orchidectomy alone in the management of advance prostate cancer", (BJU International, Sep 2003). This prospective randomized trial compared 2 mg lycopene BID beginning on the day of orchidectomy (OL) in 27 men with metastatic prostate cancer vs. no lycopene (O) in 27 controls. At 2 years follow-up the mean PSA was 3.01 (OL) v. 9.02 ng/mL (O), (P = <0.00l). Bone scan responses were superior in OL at P = <.05. Of the 54 enrollees 12 (O), 22%, had died v. 7, 13%, OL (P = 0.001).

 One IN VITRO vote in favor: "Lycopene inhibits the growth of normal human prostate epithelial cells in vitro", UC, Davis, CA (J Nutr. 2003, Nov). The study assessed cell proliferation and cell cycle progression and found significant growth inhibition in a dose dependent fashion resulting from cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase, a finding that would support lycopene as a cancer prevention agent.

SELENIUM: One CLINICAL vote in favor of selenium: "Toenail selenium levels and the subsequent risk of prostate cancer: a prospective cohort study", The Netherlands (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers, 2003, Sep). The Netherlands Cohort Study measured baseline selenium levels in toenail clippings from 58,279 enrollees aged 55-69 years. At 6.3 years of follow-up 540 incident cases of PC were diagnosed. A case-cohort analysis was performed evaluating comparative PC incidence segregated into increasing selenium quintiles. The incidence rate ratios were 1.00 (ref), 1.05, 0.69, 0.75, and 0.69 (P-trend=0.008) arranged by increasing selenium levels in the clippings, giving support to the hypothesis that higher selenium intake may reduce prostate cancer risk.

One EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL MODEL vote in favor: "Inorganic Selenium Retards Progression of Experimental Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer" (J. Urol, 2004, Feb). The growth of tumor implants and the development of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases in mice were retarded by dietary selenium.

Two IN VITRO votes in favor: A Stanford report finds that selenium decreases gene expression of the androgen receptor (AR) gene and AR-regulated genes in an androgen-sensitive human prostate cancer cell line and increases transcripts of two detoxification enzymes (Mol Biol Cell, 2003, Nov). From Cancer Research, Jan, 2004, comes the report "Prostate Specific Antigen Expression is Down-Regulated by Selenium Through Disruption of Androgen Receptor Signaling", Roswell Park Cancer Institute. The study was conducted in androgen-responsive cells. Within hours PSA production decreased followed later by a reduction of the expression of the AR gene and decreased AR activation of genes under AR control.

Bottom Line: The final counting of the voting on Selenium will come in the future when the results of the SELECT TRIAL are reported (Selenium 200 mcg./day is one arm in the study). The voting on Lycopene continues in multiple clinical studies.

« Back to Article List


(c) 2001 Seattle Prostate Institute -  All rights reserved.