HomeAbout SPIFor PatientsFor PhysiciansSPI DoctorsDirections206.215.2480

Clinical Training CoursesTechnical AssistanceBrachytherapy ConferencePCa Commentary



PCa Commentary
 

Does 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 Always Equal 7? (October 2003)

Not quite - when the issue is the influence of Gleason scores on treatment outcome. In the prostate cancer world when adding Gleason grades to arrive at the Gleason score, it is more like 3 + 4 = 7- and 4 + 3 = 7+. Practitioners in prostate cancer know this. However, it was very clearly set out by a group at MCKCC in "The Prognostic Significance of Gleason Grade in Patients Treated with Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy" (Int J Rad Onc Biol Phys Vol.56, pp.749-754, 2003). They studied 1029 T1/T2 PC cases with Gleason sums 6, 7, 8 with a median F/U of 46 months. Failure was set (ASTRO definition) at the midpoint between the posttreatment nadir and the first of three consecutive PSA rises. Results at 7 years: biochemical freedom from relapse for GG 3 + 3 was 81.8%; for GG 3 + 4, 78.4%; for GG 4 + 3, 56%; and for GG 4 + 4, 50.7%. Similar findings for outcome post RP have been published. Herman, Kattan, Scardino, AM J Surg Pathol 2001, 25(5):657-660, reported the findings from their study of RP in 832 cases. Although the primary Gleason grade 4 lost independent  significance when collated with the available information regarding tumor volume, surgical margins, and the status of seminal vesicles, extracapsular extension, and lymph nodes, none the less, the primary Gleason grade 4 remained significantly correlated with the other predictors of progression.

Bottom Line: When reported by excellent pathologists, major Gleason pattern 4 carries adverse prognostic significance.

« Back to Article List


(c) 2001 Seattle Prostate Institute -  All rights reserved.