HomeAbout SPIFor PatientsFor PhysiciansSPI DoctorsDirections206.215.2480

Clinical Training CoursesTechnical AssistanceBrachytherapy ConferencePCa Commentary



PCa Commentary
 

Osteonecrosis of the Jaw, Androgen Deprivation, and Bisphosphonates (May 2007)

An article in the May issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology, "Randomized Controlled Trial of Annual Zoledronic Acid to Prevent Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist-Induced Bone Loss in Men with Prostate Cancer" demonstrated in osteoporotic men (T score > -2.5) on ADT with non-metastatic disease that a single dose of 4 mg of the bisphosphonate, Zometa, increased bone mineral density after one year by 4.0% vs. a 3.1% loss in the placebo arm. This finding will likely further increase the use of this class of drug in prostate cancer.

Current clinical practice guidelines now endorse the use of a much higher dosage regimen, i.e. 4 mg IV every three weeks in men with objective bone metastases, a therapy used with regularity. The finding in the JCO study that by comparison such a minimal exposure as 4 mg yearly of this bisphosphonate yields real benefit in the avoidance of androgen deprivation (AD) related bone loss is very good news. An excess of 200 case reports have suggested that heavier dosing and/or long-term usage of bisphosphonates is associated with a rare, but significant toxicity: osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). The principal affected site is the mandible. No clinical trials have as yet established the true incidence of this complication, but based on these case reports, an initial estimate is between 1% and 10%.

A comprehensive review of this issue, "Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Cancer Patients Receiving IV Bisphosphonates", was presented by Poznak and Estilo, in Oncology, August 2006. The mechanism leading to the bone destruction underlying this pathology is not understood, but suppositions invoke the possibility that the inhibition of osteoclast function by these drugs "may predispose bone to delayed bone remodeling", as might occur after dental extractions. The condition usually involves exposed bone in the maxilla or mandible. Other explanations include disruption of bone microarchitecture, or inflammation/infection as contributing factors. In this regard it may be relevant that AD triples the risk of periodontal disease (Urology 2007;177).

"Although it is often associated with a recent dental surgical procedure, spontaneous ONJ can also occur. Patients commonly present with symptoms such as "pain, drainage, swelling, and anesthesia/paresthesia." The exposed bone appears "necrotic and non-vital." Evidence of bony destruction can be seen on CT/MRI images and increased tracer uptake is seen at those sites on bone scans. "Histologically necrotic bone with associated Actinomycetes colonization is often seen. Soft tissue or gingival biopsies reveal inflammed squamous mucosa or granulation tissue."

The incidence increases with the duration of treatment. The review noted that "the median time to ONJ in patients [receiving bisphosphonates] with metastatic breast cancer or multiple myeloma to be 39 to 72 months in those treated with pamidronate [Aredia] and 18 months in those treated with zoledronic acid [Zometa]." Other studies found a lesser incidence of ONJ with pamidronate therapy. A better estimate of incidence will likely emerge from the inclusion of monitoring for ONJ in two upcoming trials using long-term bisphosphonates in breast cancer.

A report (Leukemia. 2007, Apr 5),"A different schedule of zoledronic acid can reduce the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with multiple myeloma" compared the occurrence of ONJ in one group of patients receiving monthly bisphosphonate therapy until intolerance, to a group that received monthly treatment for one year and then every three months thereafter. The incidence of adverse skeletal events was similar, but the reduced schedule group had an eight-fold reduction in ONJ. ONJ was higher in those receiving Zometa vs pamidronate ( 9.1 vs 1.6 per 100 person years).

ONJ is not confined to those persons receiving the more potent bisphosphonates, pamidronate or zoledronic acid. Alendronate (Fosamax) and risedronate (Actinel) are commonly used as long-term therapy for cancer-unrelated osteoprosis. A March 20, 2007 report in the Annals of Internal Medicine evaluated the use of Fosamax in prostate cancer: "Effect of once-weekly [70 mg] oral alendronate on bone loss in men receiving androgen deprivation [ADT] therapy for prostate cancer: a randomized trial." This study of 112 men with non-metastatic cancer receiving ADT therapy found that "In men treated with alendronate, bone mineral density increased at 1 year by 3.7% at the spine and 1.6% at the femoral neck." The respective figures for the placebo group were losses of 1.4% and 0.7%. The observation that "At baseline, 39% of men had osteoporosis and 52% had low bone mass" just underscores the recommendation that all men undergo a DEXA study before starting ADT.

The dental community is very sensitized to the risk of ONJ posed by bisphosphonate useage since they are the professionals who perform the dental surgery and are called upon to treat the condition. The Oncology review points out the obvious, that "Oral health is an important component of the patient's overall care" and recommends a dental assessment prior to the start of antiresorptive drugs. There is no standard treatment for ONJ. "General approaches to managing ONJ include the use of antibacterial rinses, conservative and minimal debridement with focus on removing sharp edges of bone, and antibiotic therapy if superinfection is present."

Bottom Line: For the oncology community, the important message is to be aware of the risk of the infrequent occurrence of osteonecrosis of the jaw associated with bisphosphonate useage during ADT therapy. This knowledge should lead to the regular inspection of the oral cavity and an inquiry about symptoms in every person on long-term bisphosphonate treatment.

« Back to Article List


(c) 2007 Seattle Prostate Institute -  All rights reserved.