HomeAbout SPIFor PatientsFor PhysiciansSPI DoctorsDirections206.215.2480

Clinical Training CoursesTechnical AssistanceBrachytherapy ConferencePCa Commentary



PCa Commentary
 

Ketoconazole: Further thoughts about this second-line hormone intervention (May 2003)

Ketoconazole is one of the triad of second-line hormone interventions to be considered when the PSA rises after successful suppression by androgen deprivation. An excellent summary of "Secondary Hormone Therapies in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer" was presented by Wm. Oh in UROLOGY Vol.60, Supplement to September 2002, p. 87. There continues to be a bit of a mystery about how ketoconazole, customarily prescribed as an "anti-fungal" agent, actually functions as a treatment for prostate cancer. However, the most common inference is that, after being exposed for a time to the low testosterone environment fostered by an LHRH agonist, the androgen receptor responds by increasing its sensitivity to testosterone. Ketoconazole is known to decrease the production of testosterone and cortisol by the adrenal gland, which normally provides about 5% - 10% of the total serum testosterone. The coupling of these two thoughts leads to speculation that this additional lowering of serum testosterone by ketoconazole may further inhibit signaling via the androgen receptor and thereby slow the proliferation of cancer cells. New information, however, suggests that this scenario may be too simplistic.

But first, what does the established record tell about the effectiveness of this drug in "hormone refractory" PC ? Because, ketoconazole may lower the adrenal's output of cortisol, replacement doses of prednisone or hydrocortisone are customarily prescribed. But the companion use of a cortisol introduces difficulty in identifying the specific independent efficacy of ketoconazole, since prednisone or Decadron themselves have significant efficacy in PC treatment.

Wm. Oh summarized the best current studies of ketoconazole and hydrocortisone. When efficacy was judged by the criterion of achieving a >50% decline of PSA, the studies, using the conventional dose of 400 mg TID, showed responses of 27%, 40%, and 63%. An important article (to which I will return) by Harris, "Low Dose Ketoconazole with Replacement doses of Hydrocortisone [30 mg. / day] in Patients with Progressive Androgen Independent Prostate Cancer" (J UROL. Aug. 2002, p. 542) very nicely demonstrated that a dose of 200 mg. TID is equally efficacious, yielding a response of 55% and 30 weeks median duration. The cost was less with fewer side effects.(A 200 mg. pill costs about $3.10 = about $280-300/month.) The duration of median response has generally been four to five months, with some responses strikingly longer. In Harris' study, those men who did not respond to the 200 mg. dose had no response to re-challenge with the higher dose. Side effects from ketoconazole can be troublesome: nausea, 29%, fatigue, 14%, edema, rash, and heptotoxicity, and the drug can effect a potentially dangerous rise in the blood levels of coumadin and the statin drugs. The medication should be taken on an empty stomach.

The interpretation of efficacy and duration of response in all these prior studies is made difficult because of the current tendency for clinicians to intervene with secondary hormonal therapies at an earlier point in the face of a rising PSA. Early therapeutic intervention is likely to encounter a lower tumor burden against which treatment may be more effective and can introduce "lead time bias" that can confound comparing time to survival endpoints. These considerations are relevant since all the quoted studies involved substantial numbers of men with well established metastatic disease and high PSAs (median of 49 ng/ml, range 6.3 - 557.8, in the Harris study). Among the 28 men in that study only 8 men were treated for progression indicated only by PSA elevation, the rest progressing with clinically evident bone and soft tissue disease. A PSA response occurred in only 33% of men with bone and/or soft tissues disease, whereas 75% (6 of 8)of men responded in the group treated for PSA rise only. Harris also discusses the intrepretive difficulties resulting from utilizing the combination of ketoconazole and cortisol. The reported efficacy of corticosteroids alone in PC treatment is 16-29% for 30-40 mg. of hydrocortisone. Nishimura (CANCER, Dec., 2000, p. 2570) reported a 62% PSA response to Decadron at 0.5-2 mg/day.

The Harris study added information that confounds our current speculation about the mode of ketoconazole's action. The output of adrenal androgens (androstenedione, DHEA, and DHEAS) was significantly lowered by the drug, however, "the degree of androgen suppression was not associated with response nor was the degree of suppression predicted by response to low dose ketoconazole." This finding points to alternative explanations for drug mechanism of action.

The basis of the action of ketoconazole is interference with the function of a very important family of enzymes, the Cytochrome P-450 enzymes. The inhibition of one member of this family accounts for preventing the conversion in the adrenal gland of cholesterol into the androgens and cortisol. There is emerging evidence that the enzyme, Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) - the target of the anti-arthritic drugs, Vioxx and Celebrex , stimulates cellular proliferation and likely is associated with initiation or progression of cancer. A recent study shows that ketoconazole via a complex feedback loop inhibits the production of this sometimes harmful COX-2 enzyme. A study by Peehl (J UROL, Oct 2002) reported anti-proliferative effects of ketoconaszole in tissue culture that resulted from interference with P-450 enzymes. These findings are intriguing leads that may be developed into new avenues of therapy for prostate cancer.

Bottom Line: Ketoconazole has moderate effectiveness as a second-line treatment for PCa

« Back to Article List


(c) 2001 Seattle Prostate Institute -  All rights reserved.