HomeAbout SPIFor PatientsFor PhysiciansSPI DoctorsDirections206.215.2480

Clinical Training CoursesTechnical AssistanceBrachytherapy ConferencePCa Commentary



PCa Commentary
 

Intermittent Androgen Deprivation: Promising Theory, Results Pending. (References available)

The honeymoon period of PSA depression that results from initial androgen deprivation conceals progressive subclinical cellular adaptations that eventually culminate into androgen insensitive prostate cancer. These are the adaptations that a strategy of intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) strives to repress and postpone. Considerable research has focused on these adaptations and the results from the many Phase II trials have been instructive.

After the initial wave of apoptotic death of prostate cancer cells resulting from the initial steep decline of testosterone, the surviving cells promptly activate their survival "applications." The paucity of testosterone immediately upregulates genes expressing Bcl-2 and clusterin, anti-apoptotic proteins that promote cell survival; the testosterone deprived environment effects an increase in cell surface androgen receptors and greater cellular sensitivity to the diminished, residual testosterone; and cells resourcefully explore new signaling pathways by mutating the androgen receptor to widen its ligand preferences and lay the groundwork for alternative proliferative signaling via protein kinase A and the troublesome IL-6. The theory and hope underlying IAD is that the periodic pattern of testosterone restoration in IAD will abrogate these events, thereby prolonging disease control.

What has been learned from research and Phase II trials?

  •  IAD is feasible, and most likely is associated with survival outcomes similar to continuous androgen suppression. Validated questionnaires document a modest benefit in "quality of life".

  • Initial treatment durations (the "on" periods) of 9 months or even >1 year produce the longest "off" periods.

  • The most appropriate candidates for IAD are men whose PSAs fall to <.2 ng/ml (preferable "undetectable") after the initial "on" period of AD.

  • Younger men; men with higher Gleason sums, or higher baseline PSAs are less successfully treated with IAD. The duration of the initial no-treatment time (the "off' period) appears to be shortened relative to higher baseline levels of serum PSA and less deep PSA nadirs, and these features are associated with higher Gleason scores (Bruchovshy).

  • A single 3 month depot Lupron results in a median castrate level of testosterone of 6 months.

  • The duration of "off" treatment periods gradually shorten and vary with the factors listed above, but initial "off" periods of 9 to 16 or more months are common.

  • The PSA signal for restarting AD set forth in the different protocols varies widely from 3 ng/ml to 20 ng/ml PSA.

  • Bruchovsky studied the relationship of testosterone and PSA in cycles of AD and found that the recovery of testosterone precedes the rise of PSA by approximately 6 months. He observed that if the PSA rise precedes the testosterone recovery then androgen insensitivity is likely developing.

  • Under study is the possibility that continuous finasteride will lengthen the "off" period, and in some studies finasteride prolonged the no-treatment period from 24 weeks (without the medication) to 80 weeks. There is some evidence that rapid re-exposure to testosterone of an androgen deprived cell will reawaken apoptotic potential (Bruchovsky) and this area is under study as a technique to maintain cell sensitivity to AD and prolong remission.

The currently active nationwide omnibus Phase III randomized protocol (i.e., SWOG 9346, & ECOG, et.al.) tests IAD in men with metastatic disease. Activated in May 1995 with a goal of more than 1500 registrants, it prescribes the combination of Zoladex and Casodex for all men for a period of 7 months. Participants achieving a PSA of < 4 ng/ml are randomized between IAD or continuous androgen deprivation. For the IAD group a PSA of >20 ng/ml is the signal for restarting 7 more months of treatment with cycles repeating as long as the study requirements are met. The results are several years away.

At the AUA meeting in May 2003 a German group reported preliminary results from the first randomized prospective trial comparing IAD to continuous (C) treatment. The protocol design compared Lupron administered either intermittently or continuously in men experiencing their first PSA relapse (PSA > 1 ng/ml) following radical prostatectomy, 82 men (IAD) v. 68 (C). All men initially received Lupron for 6 months, and those who achieved a PSA <0.5 ng/ml were then randomized between the two arms of the study. In the IAD group treatment was restarted when the PSA levels became 3 ng/ml. The median pretreatment PSA in the IAD group was 3.5 and the mean off-treatment period in the IAD group was 9.9 months in cycle #1 and 6.1 months in cycle #2. Normal testosterone levels were regained in the IAD group 4 months after treatment cessation. At a current median follow-up of 24 months there is no significant difference between the two groups in time to disease progression. However, this is much too short a period of follow-up to support any overall conclusions.

Bottom Line: An intermittent androgen deprivation treatment strategy in relapsed PC offers important theoretical advantages, but superiority over continuous androgen deprivation has not yet been established.

« Back to Article List


(c) 2001 Seattle Prostate Institute -  All rights reserved.