HomeAbout SPIFor PatientsFor PhysiciansSPI DoctorsDirections206.215.2480

Clinical Training CoursesTechnical AssistanceBrachytherapy ConferencePCa Commentary



PCa Commentary
 

Now the World Knows We Need a Better Mousetrap (October 2003)

Ever since the NEJM publication in July on "Effect of Verification Bias on Screening for Prostate Cancer by Measurement of Prostate-Specific Antigen", the news media has heralded the deficiency of the PSA test in prostate cancer detection. Seattle Times, July 30: "...PSA test - probably misses more than 80% of the cancers in men younger than 60 and almost two-thirds of the cancers in older men." [!] Unfortunately, until (and if) rapid, high-throughput  throughput serum proteomics or other new approaches come to our rescue, we are left with rearranging the various permutations of the "PSA" molecule to gain greater test specificity.

A claim of greater test specificity was recently made by Mikolajczyk, Beckman Coulter, Inc., in his presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (published in Keio Journal of Medicine, 52(2):86-91, June 2003). His Beckman group "have developed highly specific and sensitive research immunoassays for BPSA [associated with BPH] and the different forms of proPSA.

A bit of background biology: In normal prostate glands proPSA is secreted into the glandular lumen where seven amino acids are cleaved to create active PSA, some of which gains access to the circulation where it is immediately complexed. In cancer, presumable because of disruption of the basement membrane, the proPSA enters the circulation directly and, by avoiding entering the lumen, escapes the enzymatic conversion into active PSA. The result is greater quantities of proPSA in the serum. The measurement of this proPSA is the basis of their test, which aims at better detection of the prostate cancer, present in 20 - 30% of men in the 2 - 4 ng/ml PSA range.

Results: When the proPSA test was set at a sensitivity of 90% and applied to men within the PSA range of 2.5-4 ng/ml "the specificity for the proPSA was 25% compared to 10% for %free PSA and complexed PSA (P=<0.001). And this increased specificity was maintained in the PSA range of 4 - 10 ng/ml.

Bottom Line: Any increase in the specificity of "PSA" testing will help to avoid negative biopsies.

 

« Back to Article List


(c) 2001 Seattle Prostate Institute -  All rights reserved.