HomeAbout SPIFor PatientsFor PhysiciansSPI DoctorsDirections206.215.2480

Clinical Training CoursesTechnical AssistanceBrachytherapy ConferencePCa Commentary



PCa Commentary
 

The use of "Zometa" and "Pamidronate" in prevention of osteoporosis and in retarding the progression of metastases in bone. (November 2002)

Two major skeletal morbidities plague men undergoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for advanced prostate cancer: osteoporosis and progression of bone metastasis. Both lead to pain and fractures. In the October 2,2002, issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute this issue was addressed in an editorial in concert with a study of 643 men on ADT with metastatic bone lesions and rising PSA values. The comparison was between treatment with 4 mg of Zometa at three-week intervals versus placebo over 15 months.

Emerging data is clearly showing that osteoporosis is a significant problem in association with androgen deprivation therapy. Multiple studies show that after one year on ADT men show a 5% to 10% decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) and ADT increases fracture risk 2-fold. 80% of men with advanced prostate cancer develop skeletal metastasis and this group is usually treated with ADT for some number of years.

Smith (N Eng J Med 345;948-955,2001) reported that Pamidronate at 60 mg IV q 12 weeks (trade name "Aredia") (now succeeded by IV Zometa, 100-850 times more potent) protected men from any further loss in bone mineral density at 48 weeks as compared to a loss of 8.5% in the placebo group. It's interesting that 4 mg IV Zometa can prevent progression of osteoporosis in cancer free individuals with dosing as infrequent as once per year. The most efficient dosing schedule for Zometa in cancer patients is under study.

Zometa (as do all bisphosphonates) interferes with bone resorbing action of osteoclasts. Bone lesions in PC are classically considered "osteoblastic", which implies that they are the result of bone build up as opposed to bone loss ("osteolytic"). Clinicians might wonder if a drug that inhibits bone resorption would be useful in a disease that is typically considered to be associated with osteoblastic lesions. However, studies have shown that there is a significant component of osteolysis in PC bone metastases.

The recent study of 643 men reported in the JNCI focused on men with established skeletal metastasis. On average all men had 4.2 skeletal metastases and median PSA was ~80 ng/mL. Zometa prolonged the time to the development of new skeletal events to 420 days versus 321 for placebo (P=.01) and markers of bone resorption were significantly decreased by Zometa.

The accompanying editorial concluded that Zometa was a reasonable option for men at high risk for bone fractures but more data would be required before it becomes standard therapy for all PC men with any degree of skeletal metastases. The issue of what extent of metastatic bone involvement warrants intervention with Zometa is currently up to the clinician's judgment.

The issue of cost is always relevant. 4 mg Zometa is priced at $915 and infusion costs are additional. Perhaps further studies will refine the recommendations regarding the usage of bisphosphonates relative to the aspect of cost effectiveness.

Bottom Line: 1) Evaluate BMD in men undergoing ADT and utilize a bisphosphonate to prevent bone loss, and 2) use Zometa in instances of significant bone metastases.

« Back to Article List


(c) 2001 Seattle Prostate Institute -  All rights reserved.