HomeAbout SPIFor PatientsFor PhysiciansSPI DoctorsDirections206.215.2480

Clinical Training CoursesTechnical AssistanceBrachytherapy ConferencePCa Commentary



PCa Commentary
 

Gene Expression Silencing in PIN Cancels the Detoxification Enzyme Glutathione (March 2003)

The question of whether HGPIN can be identified as a precursor to PC was addressed by Dr. Sidransky, Professor of Urology and Director of Research in Molecular Biology at the Johns Hopkins' Kimmel Cancer Center in the article, "Quantification of GSTP1 [Glutathione S-Transferase] Methylation in Non-neoplastic Prostatic Tissue and Organ Confined Prostate Adenocarcinoma" (JNCI, November 2001). "Methylation" refers to the presence of a methyl group attached to a member of the sequence of bases in the DNA chain (in this case, specifically, the base cytidine in the promoter region in the gene) thereby preventing the transcription mechanism from "reading" the gene and thereby "silencing" it. Methylation is one of nature's favored mechanisms for selecting which genes should and should not be expressed and when that expression should take place in the sequence of development. The polymerase chain reaction assay was employed to identify the obstructing presence of methylation preventing the expression of the GSTP1 gene thereby depriving the cell of the benefits of the detoxifying enzyme glutathione. Glutathione provides an important element of protection against oxidative damage to DNA, damage that can lead to DNA strand breaks and unwanted mutations. The methylation of this specific gene is the most common adverse alteration of DNA in prostate neoplasia and develops very early in the disease process. In his study of 69 prostatectomy specimens with organ-confined adenocarcinoma 63 showed this abnormality. Twenty eight of these specimens contained both PC and HGPIN, and in 15 of these HGPIN showed methylation of the GSTP1 promoter. In a separate study of TURP specimens 9 of 31 showed methylation. However, when the extent of methylation in PC, HGPIN, and BPH was evaluated quantitatively, significant separation of the results was found among the three types of lesions. These results were compared to a control lesion with no methylation to establish a ratio of expression, and the median ratio of methylation in BPH (from the TURP study) compared to control was 0 (range 0-0.1); in HGPIN 1.4 (range 0-49.5); and in PC 250.8 (range 53.5-697.5), raising the intriguing issue of whether the extent of GSTP1 methylation in HGPIN lesions predicts progression to invasive cancer. Since histologic identification of the suspected transition from HGPIN to PC has been elusive, perhaps by evaluating the levels of methylation in HGPIN lesions pathologists can establish persuasive evidence of this transition. Perhaps by quantitating methylation in HGPIN it would also be possible to place a specific instance of HGPIN at its appropriate position along the suspected spectrum of progression toward recognizable prostate cancer. Understanding of this sort would have an impact on the management of this vexing lesion. The GSTP1 test can be performed on paraffin-embeded tissue tissue from prostate biopsies and could be used in retrospective studies. This issue is under active study at Johns Hopkins.

Bottom Line: Additional data will be coming from Dr Sidransky on this important issue.
 

« Back to Article List


(c) 2001 Seattle Prostate Institute -  All rights reserved.